Orbital Impact: cde


thelingerieaddict:

I used the word ‘derivative’ for two reasons.

1) As stated in the post, I don’t know who came first, the tights or the artist’s work. This is in sharp contrast to the Curvy Kate incident, which obviously came last.

2) Rosea Posey’s photograph, even if it was inspired by these tights, could be considered social commentary and art. Transformative use (such as that which offers commentary or criticism) falls under Fair Use provisions. In the same way the popular Buffy vs. Edward video is derivative of two larger works, but exists as a work protected by Fair Use under it’s own right (as it’s very clearly social commentary). Curvy Kate’s use of the image was not transformative and made no social commentary. It was lifted directly from the photograph. That’s roughly equivalent to copying an article from Wikipedia to publish as your own, but claiming it’s original because you changed a few words.

As far as your claims that I’m biased…yeah, I am. I don’t like plagiarism. I don’t like copying. I don’t like when large corporations steal from independent artists and designers because they think they can get away with it. All of that bothers me. And if that kind of ‘obvious bias’ is a problem for you, I’m okay with that.

c-d-e:

thelingerieaddict:

Several people have e-mailed me to say that Rosea Posey’s photograph is derivative of a pair of tights that came out in 2010. I don’t know the timetable for who came first, but in the interests of fairness, I’m also posting those tights to my Tumblr.

It’s funny. You call say CurvyKate had the AUDACITY TO STEAL, but you say Rosea Posey’s is just derivate. Hello obvious BIAS.

Yes, because someone stealing from a small designer is any better. Or when there is no Fair use in international, or Spanish law (and considering it’s a spanish copyright, Spanish copyright law applies, not american). Or when you think you are the arbiter of what “social commentary” is. So Rosea steals the idea, uncredited (Plagiarism much? Worth getting expelled from school much?), from a small overseas designer, changes it’s meaning. But not really. Look at the original spanish version. The meaning of the words are different, and has obvious social commentary purposes. So Rosea’s work is NOT transformative either. It’s just another student blindly stealing an idea and expression, that’s probably going to get her in trouble with her school now (yes, they can retroactively pull a diploma).


  1. etta-candy-irl reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  2. boredom-kills-me reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  3. whatcandeeloves reblogged this from eating-your-crepe-cakes
  4. samariajasmine reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  5. eating-your-crepe-cakes reblogged this from decembercat
  6. fox-that-rox reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  7. arcelian reblogged this from xx-silverbear-xx
  8. kwelpie reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  9. awesomesock reblogged this from myresin
  10. nevermind-i-quit reblogged this from thebloodisthelife
  11. misguidedwanderlust reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  12. myresin reblogged this from nocakeno and added:
    Some of those words basically mean the same as another word on that list.
  13. razalassiriso reblogged this from friskyonwhisky
  14. 50shades-of-ba-sing-se reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  15. xx-silverbear-xx reblogged this from uhohdynamo
  16. pleasantfoodie reblogged this from mandavee and added:
    I want these.
  17. demet3r reblogged this from kayladaila
  18. mandala-lore reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  19. soulpurifier412 reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  20. itwouldtakeaneternity reblogged this from coreycurtaincall
  21. zydratexanatomy reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  22. friskyonwhisky reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  23. thebloodisthelife reblogged this from supersakolin
  24. purrprinthom reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
  25. supersakolin reblogged this from thelingerieaddict
To Tumblr, Love PixelUnion